Supplementary Bird Feeding Research

The results of the supplementary bird feeding research we've been involved with have now been published online.


Research Article

Intensive supplementary feeding improves the performance of wild bird seed plots in provisioning farmland birds throughout the winter: a case study in lowland England.


Richard K. Broughton, Michael G.W. Kettlewell, Marta Maziarz, Stephen H. Vickers, Alan Larkman & Ian Wilkinson


Received 05 Dec 2020, Accepted 15 Feb 2021, Published online: 20 May 2021


ABSTRACT

Capsule

Sown bird-food plots with intensive (daily) supplementary feeding throughout the winter attracted substantially greater numbers of seed-eating farmland birds than control plots without additional feeding, whose planted seed resource was exhausted by mid-winter.

Aims

We studied the performance of cultivated agri-environment scheme (AES) plots, predominantly growing wild bird seed (WBS), in addressing the ‘hungry gap’ of food scarcity for seed-eating farmland birds over the winter period. We assessed whether intensive supplementary feeding could improve AES-WBS plot performance to support greater numbers of birds over a longer period throughout the winter.

Methods

Five monthly bird counts were conducted from November to March on AES-WBS plots on three farms during three winters, alongside assessment of standing seed availability on the plants. Daily supplementary feeding of 8–25 kg of mixed seeds was scattered directly onto each treatment plot, with additional seed provided in hanging bird-feeders. The density of target farmland birds, and the depletion of the standing seed resource on plants, was compared between treatment plots and controls over the winter, using generalized linear models.

Results

Cultivated AES-WBS plots contained only approximately 25% of their potential full capacity of seed availability at the beginning of winter, and this was exhausted by January. Supplementary feeding attracted significantly greater numbers of farmland birds to AES-WBS plots than unfed controls, with up to 421 birds per plot, dominated by Common Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs, Yellowhammers Emberiza citronella, and Common Linnets Linaria cannabina. Bird densities on fed plots peaked in the late winter (February) ‘hungry gap’, but the magnitude of peak densities varied between years and farms.

Conclusion

Intensive supplementary feeding can substantially improve poor performance of AES-WBS plots in supporting farmland birds throughout the winter, particularly during the late winter ‘hungry gap’ when seed availability on AES-WBS plots is otherwise exhausted.


Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Professor Alan Grafen for analytical advice and to Professor Richard Dawkins and Professor Richard Pywell for comments on the manuscript. Jo Kettlewell, Sam Lane, and Celine Wilkinson assisted and supported fieldwork. Defra supported supplementary feeding through Countryside Stewardship, Entry Level Stewardship, and Higher Level Stewardship schemes, and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and Kirsty Brannan provided advice and support. Louise Spicer and The Wychwood Project’s Bird Aid scheme encouraged and supported the initiation of supplementary feeding.


Article published at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00063657.2021.1922356?scroll=top&needAccess=true





30 views

Recent Posts

See All